<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Revenge of the &lt;T&gt;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://madbean.com/2005/mb2004-30/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://madbean.com/2005/mb2004-30/</link>
	<description>The other kind of micro blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Jan 2012 22:23:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: 123Scottyb</title>
		<link>http://madbean.com/2005/mb2004-30/comment-page-1/#comment-134647</link>
		<dc:creator>123Scottyb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2008 17:53:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://madbean.com/blog/2004-30#comment-134647</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Great stuff well funny... generics is the way&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great stuff well funny&#8230; generics is the way</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill R</title>
		<link>http://madbean.com/2005/mb2004-30/comment-page-1/#comment-420</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill R</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Dec 2005 18:56:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://madbean.com/blog/2004-30#comment-420</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;With all the frameworks etc. I think Java stopped being a simple language a long time ago.  Relatively speaking, I think C/C++ are a lot more simple: a smaller (in relation to Java) set of core API&#039;s that you can extrapolate from.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With all the frameworks etc. I think Java stopped being a simple language a long time ago.  Relatively speaking, I think C/C++ are a lot more simple: a smaller (in relation to Java) set of core API&#8217;s that you can extrapolate from.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Notany</title>
		<link>http://madbean.com/2005/mb2004-30/comment-page-1/#comment-295</link>
		<dc:creator>Notany</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Jan 2005 10:49:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://madbean.com/blog/2004-30#comment-295</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Ah generics. Guy Steeles way around lack of generics. Bad Guy, bad.
&lt;code&gt;
And you&#039;re right: we were not out to win over the Lisp programmers;
we were after the C++ programmers.  We managed to drag a lot of them
about halfway to Lisp.  Aren&#039;t you happy?
  --Guy Steele - Sun Microsystems Labs (about Java)
&lt;/code&gt;
  http://www.ai.mit.edu/~gregs/ll1-discuss-archive-html/msg04045.html&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Steele and co. have dragged C++ programmers close to Smalltalk. Now starts the hard road to high-level. 
&lt;code&gt;
&quot;I believe that Java will NOT be the last language.
 The next language to be a &quot;killer-language&quot; will NOT
 be an OO language but rather a higher-level functional or
 constraint-based language.&quot;
                -- Bill Joy, JavaOne 1998.
&lt;/code&gt;
Generics, IMHO, is attempt to bring power and sophistication into wrong language. The primary strength of Java is it&#039;s simplicity. If you take simplicity away, you have sorry ass badly done replicate for Smalltalk.
&lt;code&gt;
Java was, as Gosling says in the first Java white paper,
designed for average programmers. It&#039;s a perfectly
legitimate goal to design a language for average
programmers. (Or for that matter for small children, like
Logo.) But is is also a legitimate, and very different, goal
to design a language for good programmers.
 -- PG
&lt;/code&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ah generics. Guy Steeles way around lack of generics. Bad Guy, bad.<br />
<code><br />
And you're right: we were not out to win over the Lisp programmers;<br />
we were after the C++ programmers.  We managed to drag a lot of them<br />
about halfway to Lisp.  Aren't you happy?<br />
  --Guy Steele - Sun Microsystems Labs (about Java)<br />
</code><br />
  <a href="http://www.ai.mit.edu/~gregs/ll1-discuss-archive-html/msg04045.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.ai.mit.edu/~gregs/ll1-discuss-archive-html/msg04045.html</a></p>
<p>Steele and co. have dragged C++ programmers close to Smalltalk. Now starts the hard road to high-level.<br />
<code><br />
&quot;I believe that Java will NOT be the last language.<br />
 The next language to be a &quot;killer-language&quot; will NOT<br />
 be an OO language but rather a higher-level functional or<br />
 constraint-based language.&quot;<br />
                -- Bill Joy, JavaOne 1998.<br />
</code><br />
Generics, IMHO, is attempt to bring power and sophistication into wrong language. The primary strength of Java is it&#8217;s simplicity. If you take simplicity away, you have sorry ass badly done replicate for Smalltalk.<br />
<code><br />
Java was, as Gosling says in the first Java white paper,<br />
designed for average programmers. It's a perfectly<br />
legitimate goal to design a language for average<br />
programmers. (Or for that matter for small children, like<br />
Logo.) But is is also a legitimate, and very different, goal<br />
to design a language for good programmers.<br />
 -- PG<br />
</code></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MaryMaryQuiteContrary</title>
		<link>http://madbean.com/2005/mb2004-30/comment-page-1/#comment-294</link>
		<dc:creator>MaryMaryQuiteContrary</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jan 2005 16:21:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://madbean.com/blog/2004-30#comment-294</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I know absolutely nothing about Generics, yet i was completely captivated by this extraordinary piece. Bravo!&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I know absolutely nothing about Generics, yet i was completely captivated by this extraordinary piece. Bravo!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MaryMaryQuiteContrary</title>
		<link>http://madbean.com/2005/mb2004-30/comment-page-1/#comment-293</link>
		<dc:creator>MaryMaryQuiteContrary</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jan 2005 16:20:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://madbean.com/blog/2004-30#comment-293</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I jbi&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I jbi</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lm</title>
		<link>http://madbean.com/2005/mb2004-30/comment-page-1/#comment-292</link>
		<dc:creator>lm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Jan 2005 11:20:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://madbean.com/blog/2004-30#comment-292</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Great! Too fun!! :D
Anyway &quot;generics rock&quot; is a 1% of truth, used outside collections problems may lead to &quot;&lt;boh&gt;&quot; creazyness! ;)&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great! Too fun!! <img src='http://madbean.com/wp-content/plugins/smilies-themer/adiumicons/biggrin.png' alt=':D' class='wp-smiley' /> Anyway &quot;generics rock&quot; is a 1% of truth, used outside collections problems may lead to &quot;&lt;boh&gt;&quot; creazyness! <img src='http://madbean.com/wp-content/plugins/smilies-themer/adiumicons/wink.png' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob</title>
		<link>http://madbean.com/2005/mb2004-30/comment-page-1/#comment-291</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Jan 2005 20:02:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://madbean.com/blog/2004-30#comment-291</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Very funny, but Generics Rock!  Autoboxing on the other hand is fine, but I could have lived without it.  I love Generics because they prevent me from having to write wrapper classes around collections to ensure that only the type of data I want to store is stored in my collections.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very funny, but Generics Rock!  Autoboxing on the other hand is fine, but I could have lived without it.  I love Generics because they prevent me from having to write wrapper classes around collections to ensure that only the type of data I want to store is stored in my collections.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CeeCee</title>
		<link>http://madbean.com/2005/mb2004-30/comment-page-1/#comment-290</link>
		<dc:creator>CeeCee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Jan 2005 02:06:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://madbean.com/blog/2004-30#comment-290</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Dude, that&#039;s not how you&#039;re supposed to spend your Xmas break :-P Nonetheless, awesome job! Now, tell us how you really feel about Generics :-P&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dude, that&#8217;s not how you&#8217;re supposed to spend your Xmas break :-P Nonetheless, awesome job! Now, tell us how you really feel about Generics :-P</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alan Green</title>
		<link>http://madbean.com/2005/mb2004-30/comment-page-1/#comment-289</link>
		<dc:creator>Alan Green</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Jan 2005 03:31:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://madbean.com/blog/2004-30#comment-289</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Can&#039;t wait to see trailer for Walt Disney&#039;s &quot;The Emperor&#039;s New Groovy&quot;&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can&#8217;t wait to see trailer for Walt Disney&#8217;s &quot;The Emperor&#8217;s New Groovy&quot;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: greyrat</title>
		<link>http://madbean.com/2005/mb2004-30/comment-page-1/#comment-288</link>
		<dc:creator>greyrat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Jan 2005 16:13:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://madbean.com/blog/2004-30#comment-288</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;R - O - F - L - O - L ! U teh r0x0rs d00d!!1!&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>R &#8211; O &#8211; F &#8211; L &#8211; O &#8211; L ! U teh r0x0rs d00d!!1!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

