Comments on: JSP is dead, long live JSP (or, EL and tag injection) http://madbean.com/2004/mb2004-4/ Your zero step program Sat, 22 Nov 2008 05:01:00 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3 By: Luis O'Shea http://madbean.com/2004/mb2004-4/#comment-298 Luis O'Shea Sat, 14 Feb 2004 02:38:00 +0000 http://madbean.com/blog/2004-4#comment-298 <p>Have you tried Jamon (www.jamon.org)? It is a very flexible, type-safe templating language for Java. So if you use a template that needs a Foo and Bar and you don't pass them in, then your code won't compile (as opposed to giving you a runtime error). And being a templating language you can use it to generate emails, or anything else (it is not dependent).</p> Have you tried Jamon (www.jamon.org)? It is a very flexible, type-safe templating language for Java. So if you use a template that needs a Foo and Bar and you don’t pass them in, then your code won’t compile (as opposed to giving you a runtime error). And being a templating language you can use it to generate emails, or anything else (it is not dependent).

]]> By: Davide Baroncelli http://madbean.com/2004/mb2004-4/#comment-297 Davide Baroncelli Thu, 12 Feb 2004 14:14:09 +0000 http://madbean.com/blog/2004-4#comment-297 <p>>But there is one last thing that really bugs me about JSP. There is no standard way to >capture the output of a JSP page, besides making a HTTP request. Have a batch job that >needs to send an email? Want to use JSP to template the body of the email? Then embed >a full Servlet container in your batch app.</p> <p>I would use velocity or freemarker instead: after all it's only a small jar to import.</p> >But there is one last thing that really bugs me about JSP. There is no standard way to
>capture the output of a JSP page, besides making a HTTP request. Have a batch job that
>needs to send an email? Want to use JSP to template the body of the email? Then embed
>a full Servlet container in your batch app.

I would use velocity or freemarker instead: after all it’s only a small jar to import.

]]> By: filippo http://madbean.com/2004/mb2004-4/#comment-296 filippo Thu, 12 Feb 2004 09:13:28 +0000 http://madbean.com/blog/2004-4#comment-296 <p>I haven't used Jsp2.0 in production yet, since if don't have a J2ee1.4 compliant AppServer, but I'm really happy for the new features, and I think they'll dramatically increase our productivity. And, as far as I'm concerned, I really hope that Jsp2.0 will be so successfull to make people forget of that insane Java Server Faces.</p> <p>see also my post: http://jroller.com/page/fdiotalevi/20040211#please<em>tell</em>me<em>why</em>jsf</p> I haven’t used Jsp2.0 in production yet, since if don’t have a J2ee1.4 compliant AppServer, but I’m really happy for the new features, and I think they’ll dramatically increase our productivity.
And, as far as I’m concerned, I really hope that Jsp2.0 will be so successfull to make people forget of that insane Java Server Faces.

see also my post: http://jroller.com/page/fdiotalevi/20040211#pleasetellmewhyjsf

]]>