Comments on: java.util.regex.Pattern StackOverflowError’s on (x|y)* http://madbean.com/2004/mb2004-20/ Your zero step program Sat, 22 Nov 2008 05:40:57 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3 By: Olimatis http://madbean.com/2004/mb2004-20/#comment-240 Olimatis Fri, 19 Nov 2004 03:11:59 +0000 http://madbean.com/blog/2004-20#comment-240 <p>Using a gun is always risky ... So we must go easy with the trigger (i.e. recursivity)</p> <p>Bang! ;-)</p> Using a gun is always risky …
So we must go easy with the trigger (i.e. recursivity)

Bang! ;-)

]]> By: Rich http://madbean.com/2004/mb2004-20/#comment-239 Rich Tue, 19 Oct 2004 15:55:02 +0000 http://madbean.com/blog/2004-20#comment-239 <p>I've been noticing this indirectly from the schema validator today. Sigh.</p> I’ve been noticing this indirectly from the schema validator today. Sigh.

]]> By: Will http://madbean.com/2004/mb2004-20/#comment-238 Will Tue, 31 Aug 2004 01:03:16 +0000 http://madbean.com/blog/2004-20#comment-238 <p>I had the exact same problem today. For my purposes, switching to "(x|y)*+" has the right semantics and doesn't suffer from the dreaded StackOverflowError.</p> I had the exact same problem today. For my purposes, switching to "(x|y)*+" has the right semantics and doesn’t suffer from the dreaded StackOverflowError.

]]> By: Maik http://madbean.com/2004/mb2004-20/#comment-237 Maik Fri, 27 Aug 2004 08:53:33 +0000 http://madbean.com/blog/2004-20#comment-237 <p>It looks like Sun is not willing to fix this, see here: http://bugs.sun.com/bugdatabase/view<em>bug.do?bug</em>id=5050507</p> It looks like Sun is not willing to fix this, see here: http://bugs.sun.com/bugdatabase/viewbug.do?bugid=5050507

]]>